Green Building Linkedin Green Building Twitter Green Building Facebook Youtube Green Building

Advancing Clean Energy Manufacturing

3767464469 022454719d Advancing Clean Energy ManufacturingMany are aware of the subsidies, tax credits, and grants available to property owners and utilities to install and utilize alternative energy (i.e., wind, solar, biomass, etc.). Unfortunately, many forget that these technologies need to be manufactured somewhere. The majority of the panels that go into a photovoltaic array and the large blades that make up wind turbines are currently being manufactured overseas, often in China. This directly contradicts President Obama’s plan to spur green job growth with the passage of the Stimulus Bill. Enter the SEAM Act.

The Security in Energy and Manufacturing Act extends an existing tax credit (The Advanced Energy Manufacturing Tax Credit (MTC), which provided a 30% of total project cost credit to help fund projects that expanded, or re-equipped clean energy manufacturing plants. The SEAM Act goes beyond a simple extension of the $2.3 billion program, it redefines it. Infusing an additional $5 billion into the program while substituting grants for tax credits, it will allow smaller startups who haven’t garnered the tax liability to apply for tax credits to offset some of the costs of their planned plants. It also prioritizes purely manufacturing projects over assembly plants.

This Act comes at a key time, as there are hundreds of projects that applied for credits under MTC that were denied because funding ran out so quickly. Like the “Cash for Clunkers” program, the actual interest in MTC far outweighed initial projections, proving that it was a successful program.

But why, you might ask, should we focus on clean technology manufacturing. According to the Act’s author, Representative Phil Hare from the 17th congressional district in Illinois,

“As clean energy becomes one of the world’s largest industries, forecasted at over $2 trillion annually, advanced energy manufacturing will offer one of the best chances for the U.S. to restore its manufacturing base and create good-paying jobs domestically.”

This is only one of the many reasons why the US needs to spur clean manufacturing jobs. Over the past several decades this nation has seen its manufacturing base erode. Losing out to cheaper Chinese products, the manufacturing industry, one of the largest employment sectors in the US has seen the largest decline in jobs over the past ten years. According to the United States Department of Labor, in 1998, the manufacturing sector employed the second highest number of workers, over 17.5 million. Sense then, the industry has seen a 2.6 percent annual decrease in jobs, which is double the rate of decline of the next-to-worst sector. Advanced energy manufacturing offers a unique opportunity to pursue an environmentally responsible agenda while creating many permanent, high-paying jobs that are desperately necessary to revive an employment powerhouse in serious decline. With the promise of huge green job creation numbers to live up to, why not focus on the area of biggest potential.

The demand side makes an even stronger case to up clean technology manufacturing. With the new requirement that 25% of each state’s energy portfolio must come from clean, renewable energy being mulled over in Washington, and with the potential for a Carbon Cap and Trade system being introduced, the demand for huge new solar and wind farms will take off. Couple that with the improvements that are being made to the efficiencies of these technologies pushing them towards being on par with coal in terms of the production price per kW, and you start to have not only an environmental reason, and a government mandated reason, but also an economic reason. Maybe the one positive that came of out of the recent oil spill in the Gulf, is that it quieted some “Drill baby Drill” proponents. Clearly an increase in off-shore drilling is not the answer to our energy situation; why not look to an abundant and everlasting source, the sun, which creates not only solar power, but wind power as well.

Looking before the future, at the present, renewable energy production is already taking off. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, over the past ten years, wind energy production has increased an average of 24% annually. Over that same time period, energy production from crude oil has decreased an average of 2.4% annually. While crude oil reserves are running out, and the potential for wind and solar production is only increasing, let’s start focusing our efforts and our money on a sector that has some potential. For those of you who wonder where all this money could come from, look no further than the oil industry, which receives huge subsidies from the government so they can continue searching for an archaic fuel source that is destroying our environment. Estimates are that US Oil companies receive, according to Greenpeace, between $15 billion and $35 billion a year from tax payers in the form of avoided taxes.

Understanding Cash – It’s all about value…

After watching this video from an old professor from college I found myself suddenly urged to blog on the topic of money and cash flow:

EBS recently hosted a presentation at our office about “Navigating the Road to Sustainability” which included presentations from Shayna D. Eskew of Green Property Solutions, Ken Kurtzig of iReuse and Matt Macko of Environmental Building Strategies. The night went well and ended up being a success with closing semi intoxicated discussions about Commercial Real Estate Valuation techniques and the difference between the dreaded word “payback” and the more robust Net Present Value.

The video above demonstrates how people feel about cash and the different types of cash – needless to say an interesting topic for everyone because we all have it and usually want more of it… But how does cash relate to sustainability and the decisions that are affecting our planet, our lives and our species vitality.

My hypothesis: Feelings of cash correlate directly with assumptions of sustainability investments.

At the end of the day a dollar is a dollar right? One dollar from one source is no different than the physical and power characteristics of a dollar from another source. They both empower a user with the ability to buy something with a market value of $1 – think McDonalds here…
But what happens when those dollars come from different sources and what happens when those dollars are accounted for dirrerently is at the heart of the sustainability adoption problem we are having.

When people value the cash they have in their 401K or child’s college savings account differently than they value the cash they have in their wallet (otherwise known as disposable income) you inherently have a problem of conscience. People will be unwilling to invest those 401K dollars (assuming all things being equally liquid of course) in investments outside of what they are dedicated to do – save up for retirement, child’s college savings, etc, etc. That creates a problem with energy efficiency and clean energy adoption because right now, no one has CASH on hand. Very few people have “disposable income” and let’s face it, the question of “do i have cash” is the number one we think of needing when we think about traveling, doing projects, or buying things. Energy Efficiency is no different – cash is king. No one has it and no one is willing to part with their savings, retirement or child’s savings account to invest in it. This is true even with the transparency of data out there telling us that investments in sustainability, energy efficiency and conservation practices yield the greatest return on investment possible in today’s society.

Yes you heard me say it – Sustainability offers the greatest Return on Investment – better than stocks, bonds, mutual funds, savings accounts, 401Ks, kitchen + bath upgrades to your overvalued McMansion, or corporate’s advertising budget. For proof look to the study I performed at the end of 2009 comparing the Return on Investment in Google stock being equivalent to that of a lighting retrofit.

Google is all too often considered one of the greatest investments of the 21st century but when you compare a purchase of it’s stock at IPO and sale of that stock 5 years later (end of 2009) to that of a lighting retrofit, you will find that the Returns are virtually equal. Roughly a 200% ROI (5 year horizon).

The video above about perceptions of money compared to our understanding of sustainability valuation helps answer the question of why we can’t adopt faster and saturate quicker as we move toward our goals of being a net zero energy economy, and a carbon free economy.

The EBS Team

Ask Your Landlord About Their Green Property Management Credentials

 Ask Your Landlord About Their Green Property Management CredentialsAsk Your Landlord About Their Green Property Management Credentials
By Chris Throman of www.softwareadvice.com/property

This article discusses green designations and credentials for landlords; how impactful green property management can be on a community; and what the future may hold for green rental living.

It focuses on spurring more property managers to learn about sustainable practices in the communities they manage. After all, over 90 million Americans live on rental properties, which means property managers have a huge opportunity to increase sustainability.

To access the full article: Ask Your Landlord About Their Green Property Management Credentials

The EBS Team—